Demokrasi Radikal sebagai Alternatif Tatanan Politik Global dalam Konteks Multikulturalisme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/jiir.2021.6.2.64-74Keywords:
radical democracy, cosmopolitanism, world citizenship, global politicsAbstract
This article discusses the relevancy of cosmopolitan democracy concept in multicultural world. It argues that cosmopolitan democracy concept is not enough in achieving a just and equal political order the context of plural world-citizenship, it showed by the practice of economic, social and political structure which prevails. Hence, this article tried to search an alternative in attempt to make the idea of cosmopolitan democracy become more realistic and inclusive by adopting radical democracy concept. Firstly, it discuss the critics of Kant’s cosmopolitan view using Spivak’s conception of Planetarity. Secondly, it discuss about the plural democracy by Mouffe’s in the context of planetarity. This combination that yields a plural democracy in the context of world-citizenship.Downloads
References
Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined communities. UK: Verso Books.
Appiah, K. A. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New & London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Archibugi, D. H. (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy. An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, G. W. (2009). Grounding Cosmopolitanism From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Derrida, J. (1997). Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. London and New York: Routledge.
Held, D. (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Global Order: Reflections on the 200th Anniversary of Kant's "Perpetual Peace". Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Vol. 20, No. 4 (1995), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549502000401
Held, D. (2001). The transformation of political community: rethinking democracy in the context of globalization. In I. S. Hacker-Cordon, Democracy's Edges (pp. 84 - 111). New York: Cambridge University Press.
.Mouffe, C. (2008). Which Order: Cosmopolitan or Multipolar. Ethical Perspective 15 No.4, 453-467. DOI:10.2143/EP.15.4.2034391
Mouffe, C. (2009). Democracy in a Multipolar World. Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol.37 No.3, pp. 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829809103232
Mouffe, C. (2013). Democratic Citizenship and Political Community (1992). In J. Martin, Chantal Mouffe: Hegemony, radical democracy, and the political (pp. 103-114). London and New York: Routledge.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy vol.5 no.1 , 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00021
Sharp, J. B. (2004). Indigenous knowledges and development: a postcolonial caution. Third World Quarterly 25:4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590410001678915
Smith, A. M. (1998). Laclau and Mouffe: The radical democratic imaginary. London and New York: Routledge.
Spivak, G. (2003). The Death of Discipline. New York USA: Columbia University Press.
Spivak, G. C. (2012). Cosmopolitanisms and the Cosmopolitical. Cultural Dynamics 24 (2-3) , 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374013482350
Trepanier, L. &. (2011). Cosmopolitanism in the Age of Globalization: Citizens without States. Kentucky: University of Kentucky Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Integrative International Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JIIR site and its metadata are licensed under CC Atribution 4.0 International Public License