Minilateralism and Great Power Competition during the COVID-19 Pandemic

A Case Study of Mekong Region


  • Arrizal Anugerah Jaknanihan Department of International Relations Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia



Mekong region, COVID-19, minilateralism, great power competition


Minilateral institutions such as Lancang-Mekong Cooperation and Lower Mekong Initiative have an indispensable role in channeling the influence of external powers to the Mekong region. This article analyzes the impact of US-China competition on minilateral institutions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. By using institutional balancing theory, this article explains the geopolitical and geoeconomic imperative behind the minilateral cooperation in Mekong during the pandemic. As the external powers compete for influence, the range of minilateral cooperation has expanded to solve the issues brought by the pandemic, especially health security and economic recovery. However, notwithstanding the assistance, Mekong countries remain steadfast in maintaining their autonomy. Regional powers such as Vietnam and Thailand did this by harnessing the intra-regional institution and diversifying their partners.


Download data is not yet available.


Anuar, A and N. Hussain. “Minilateralism for Multilateralism in the Post-Covid Age.” S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. 2021. Accessed 18 April 2021,

Bosba, D. “Dynamics of Cooperation Mechanism in the Mekong.” Khmer Times. 23 October, 2018. Accessed 21 April,

Chambers, P and P. Bunyavejchewin. Thailand’s Foreign Economic Policy toward Mainland Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS Yusof-Ishak Institute, 2019.

Elmer, K. “China promises its Mekong neighbours priority access to a coronavirus vaccine developed in China” South China Morning Post. 24 August, 2020. Accessed 25 April 2021,

Ferguson, C. “The Strategic Use of Soft Balancing: The Normative Dimensions of the Chinese-Russian ‘Strategic Partnership.’” Journal of Strategic Studies 35, no. 2 (2012): 197–222.

Goh, E. “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies.” International Security 32, no. 3 (2008): 113-157.

Gong, X. “Non-Traditional Security Cooperation between China and South-East Asia: Implications for Indo-Pacific Geopolitics.” International Affairs 96, no. 1 (2020): 29–48.

He, K. “Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic Interdependence and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia.” European Journal of International Relations 14, no. 3 (2008): 489-518.

__, K, “Contested Regional Orders and Institutional Balancing in the Asia Pacific.” International Politics 52, no.2 (2015): 208–222.

Ho, S. “China and the Mekong States: Divergent Responses to Chinese Initiatives.” Asia Dialogue, 6 August, 2019. Accessed 25 April 2020,

Hurst, S and E. Ashbee. “The Trump Administration and China: Policy Continuity or Transformation?” Policy Studies, (2021): 1-18.

Katzenstein, PJ. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. New York: Cornell University Press, 2005.

Kliem, F, “The Geopolitics of Mekong and a Radical Proposal for ASEAN to Navigate It.” S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. 2020. Accessed 18 April 2021,

Koga, K. “ASEAN’s Evolving Institutional Strategy: Managing Great Power Politics in South China Sea Disputes.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11, no. 1 (2018): 49–80.

Middleton, C and J. Allouche. “Watershed or Powershed? Critical Hydropolitics, China and the ‘Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Framework.’” The International Spectator 51, no. 3 (2016): 100–117.

Motta, S and N. Matthews. “Rewards and risks of Chinese hydropower in the Mekong River Basin (GMS).” In Chinese hydropower development in Africa and Asia. Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Global Dam-Building, edited by G. Siciliano and F. Urban, 14-34. New York: Routledge, 2017.

Mun, TS, HT Ha, AS Qian, G Ong, and PTP Thao. The State of Southeast Asia: 2020. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, 2020.

Naim, M. “Minilateralism: The magic number to get real international action.” Foreign Policy. 21 June, 2009. Accessed 20 April 2021,

Nguyen, S. “Vietnam begins Covid-19 vaccination drive without China-made shots.” South China Morning Post, 7 March, 2021. Accessed 25 April 2021,

Patrick, S, “The New ‘New Multilateralism’: Minilateral Cooperation, But At What Cost?” Global Summitry 1, no. 2 (2015): 115-134.

Po, S and B. Primiano. “Explaining China’s Lancang-Mekong Cooperation as an Institutional Balancing Strategy: Dragon Guarding the Water.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 75, no. 3 (2021): 323-340.

Pompeo, M. “Opening Remarks at the Lower Mekong Initiative Ministerial.” US Mission to ASEAN. 1 August, 2019. Accessed 18 April 2021,

Sach, ND. “The Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Mechanism (LMCM) and Its Implications for the Mekong Sub-Region.” Pacific Forum Issues & Insights Working Paper 18, (2018): 1–24.

Seah, H, HT Ha, M Martinus, and PTP Thao. The State of Southeast Asia: 2021. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, 2021.

Siphana, S. “Mekong Cooperation & BRI.” Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, no. 10 (2018): 86-95.

Sopheap, S. “China’s coronavirus aid to Cambodia will boost regional relations.” Global Times. 24 August, 2020. Accessed 25 April 2021,

Summers, T. “China and the Mekong Region.” China Perspectives 3, no. 3 (2008): 68–77.

Sutthichaya, Y. “Scrutinizing US, China Mekong cooperation: The new regional battlefield.” Prachatai. 16 February, 2021. Accessed 5 May 2021,




How to Cite

Jaknanihan, A. A. (2022). Minilateralism and Great Power Competition during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Mekong Region. Journal of Integrative International Relations, 7(1), 1–20.